Dyffransow ynter amendyansow a "Wikipedia:An tavern"

Content deleted Content added
→‎Lightning talks: update about upcoming deadline
→‎Polici dilea: tregh nowyth
Linen 139:
 
::Ti'n iawn hefyd! Diolch! Mae hwn yn gweithio rwan ar bob un o'r ieithoedd Celtaidd! [[Devnydhyer:Llywelyn2000|Llywelyn2000]] ([[Keskows Devnydhyer:Llywelyn2000|keskows]]) 13:19, 27 Me 2022 (UTC)
 
== Polici dilea ==
 
In English for clarity at all levels: I'm finally getting to circling back to some of the policy stuff we very briefly discussed [[Keskows:An_tavern/Kovskrifen_2018-2021#Policies|here]]. One of them was a deletion policy. So, let's discuss that?
 
My own opinions are, essentially, that correction/improvement is preferable in almost all cases to deletion. We're not a big enough Wiki to delete short, poor or niche articles and I think that doing so would run counter to what I am always telling new/prospective editors: your Cornish IS good enough and anything is something.
 
I think that deletion should be reserved for:
* Pages in the wrong language
* Exceptionally short articles (one sentence or less) on extremely niche topics
 
As an example of the latter, [https://kw.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Inclosure_Act_1773&oldid=164350 this]. I didn't delete it in the end, I improved it slightly to [[Inclosure Act 1773|this]]. I do still think this is an article that could be deleted.
 
Perhaps someone would want to improve things like this, though? I do think that there should be some kind of grace period for articles like this where we try to find someone who is up for the task of adding a couple of sentences to the article and it is perhaps only deleted if this can't be done.
 
Anyway, I know this was something we wanted to discuss, so please let me know your thoughts.