English: This is a demonstration of traditionalist based bias as one may argue that Pythagorean triples should be represented as (a, b, c). In fact c is redundant because it can be calculated as square root of (a2 + b2). On the other hand it is a bias approach to reduce the inherent properties of the nodes to a single key as done in 2011 in file:Pythagorean.tree.svg.
a ranna – a dhasskrifa, lesranna ha treuskorra an ober
a gemyska – a aswiwa an ober
Yn-dann an ragselyow a syw:
askrifans – Res yw dhywgh ri askrifans gwiw, provia kevren dhe'n lecyans, ha meneges mar peu chanjyow gwrys. Hwi a yll gul hemma yn fordh resonus a vynnowgh, mes ny yllir y wul yn fordh a broffo synser an lecyans dh'agas skoodhya po agas devnydh.
ranna kehaval – Mar kwrewgh hwi chanjya, treusfurvya po drehevel war an ober ma, res yw dhywgh lesranna agas kevrohow yn-dann an keth lecyans hag an derowel, po lecyans kesplegadow.
Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents
Pythagorean pairs presented as a succession of the generations 1 to generation 4 of the related primitive [[:en:Pythagorean triple|]]s as an alternative codifications of the Berggrens's three
An restren ma a's teves kedhlow keworransel, dres lycklod keworrys dhyworth an kamera bysyel po an skanyer devnydhys rag hy gwruthyl po hy bysya. Mars yw chanjys an restren dhyworth hy studh gwredhek, possybyl yw na veu nebes manylyon nowedhys.